Exposing Intelligence Agency Human Rights Abuses, Government and Corporate Corruption Along with the Problems of Zionism. The Foundation of Freedom is Freedom of Thought and Freedom of Speech
Tuesday, November 28, 2023
Where's the Justice? Must Watch Documentary: Absolute Evil- Learn the History of Manipulation of Human Beings With Classified Technology
Latest Articles On Torturing People With Technology That is Covered Up- David Salinas Flores- Faculty of Medicine Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru
Below are three interesting articles, read them all. Also, watch this documentary about experimenting on people with classified technology. Pure evil. The intelligence agencies and many police officers of the western world are very aware of this technology. See here for more about Homeland Security. This is how truly sick our countries are. They rule over us and they work with criminals.
2. The secret of neuroscience boom: are there secret human experiments in Latin América?
3. Transhumanism: the big fraud-towards digital slavery
Also, read this past article here: Slavery By Satellite - Must Read Article From Academics
Saturday, January 1, 2022
The Great 'Transhumanism' Reset: 'Smart Dust' Spying on Your Brain, Human Microchipping
As early as 2014, futurologist Dr. Oskar Villani said it was possible to monitor people with barely visible computer chips. These tiny chips are called “Smart Dust.” Hundreds of them can be “transferred” to a person with a simple handshake. DARPA, a military research facility of the US Department of Defense, was significantly involved in its development. They also found a way to use Smart Dust to read our brain waves and signals, potentially exposing unexpressed thoughts and moods. The merging of humans with machines is being used to advance globalists’ interests, reshape humanity, and gain complete control over every aspect of our lives.
Futurologist Oskar Villani 2014 Interview
It appears that it is possible to transfer tiny chips, which are hardly visible to the naked eye, to other people with a handshake – it is no longer even necessary to implant microchips to monitor people. On July 1, 2014, the futurologist Oskar Villani was a guest on German television program “Heute Konkret”. The nearly 5-minute interview begins with Villani shaking hands with presenter Claudia Reiterer and then telling her that he has now transferred several hundred microchips to her, which can now be used to monitor her for up to 14 days and read a wide variety of data.
These tiny chips are called “Smart Dust,” hundreds of them can be “transferred” with a simple handshake. DARPA, a military research facility of the US Department of Defense, was significantly involved in the development. Villani also reported there is a way to use Smart Dust to monitor our brains.
Watch the following Interview with Dr. Oskar Villani that has been translated by RAIR Foundation USA here:
Intelligent Dust: Developed Through Military Research
Because the so-called ” smart dust” was already developed in the 1990s by Dr. Kris Pister, a professor of electrical engineering at the University of California, Berkeley, as a simple way to use smart wireless sensors, Pister envisioned a world where ubiquitous sensors could measure almost anything. Unsurprisingly, the U.S. military provided the impetus, funding, and development.
In 1997, DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) funded Pister’s research as part of their Smart Dust project. (DARPA was also involved in the development of mRNA technology). Then, in 2001, the American military conducted a surveillance test with the devices. After successfully calculating the speed and direction of 142 military vehicles, the test was declared a great success.
Brain Monitoring
In 2013, MIT reported, “How Smart Dust Could Spy On Your Brain.” This study revealed how Smart Dust is already developed, used, and soon will be a daily part of our lives.
Once again, Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, were the first to propose what they called ‘neural dust’ – millimeter-sized sensors that could be implanted in the body and used to stimulate nerves and muscles and monitor the activity of different organs.
It consists of “many small wireless microelectromechanical systems (MEMS).” MEMS are tiny devices with cameras, sensors, and communication mechanisms to transmit the data to be stored and further processed. They are usually between 20 micrometers and one millimeter in size. They are wirelessly connected to a computer network and distributed over a specific area to perform tasks, generally using RFID technology(Radio Frequency Identification) can be recorded.
Elon Musk and Neuralink: Can We Read People’s Minds Soon
In 2016, DARPA program manager Doug Weber stated that “neural dust [note: smart dust] represents a radical departure from the traditional approach of using radio waves for wireless communication with implanted devices.” And further: “The soft parts of our body consist mostly of saltwater. Sound waves can pass through this tissue unhindered and be focused with great accuracy on nerve targets deep in our body, while radio waves cannot.” Using ultrasound to communicate with the nerve dust also allows the sensors to be made smaller. For example, they can be introduced into the body by injection with a needle.
This, therefore, is a technology that can be used in the spirit of transhumanists. Elon Musk has already founded Neuralink, a company whose goal is to connect the human brain to a computer. The company is developing an ultra-high bandwidth brain chip to connect humans, computers, and artificial intelligence, what Musk refers to as “a Fitbit in your skull with tiny wires.”
In 2020, Musk and Neuralink demonstrated their success with implanting just such a chip in pigs, with humans being their next target.
Schwab writes that the ability “for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people’s brains will increase,” adding, “Even crossing a national border might one day involve a detailed brain scan to assess an individual’s security risk.”
Klaus goes on to state that the “Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies will not stop at becoming part of the physical world around us; they will become part of us,” adding,
Indeed, some of us already feel that our smartphones have become an extension of ourselves. Today’s external devices—from wearable computers to virtual reality headsets—will almost certainly become implantable in our bodies and brains.
Exoskeletons and prosthetics will increase our physical power, while advances in neurotechnology enhance our cognitive abilities. We will become better able to manipulate our own genes, and those of our children
For years, people have been implanted with chips linked to digital currencies and smart devices through the 5G network to process payments directly and allow them to access their homes, offices, and gyms. The chips also allow big-tech databases and government surveillance measures to track and monitor their location, activities, and behaviors.
A global system of totalitarian technocracy has arrived; of course, I’m sure it will only help us! What an exciting “brave new world” we are entering. As Klaus notes:
[It] will change not only what we do but also who we are. It will affect our identity and all the issues associated with it: our sense of privacy, our notions of ownership, our consumption patterns, the time we devote to work and leisure, and how we develop our careers, cultivate our skills, meet people, and nurture relationships.”
Wednesday, December 8, 2021
Friday, September 15, 2017
Something to Think About With Transhumanism - A Critique of Utopianism From Marx and Hayek
========================================================================
Both Marx and Hayek indict utopianism for its fundamentally nonradical method of theorizing. For both thinkers, the radical is that which seeks to get to the root of social problems, building the realm of the possible out of the conditions that exist.
By contrast, the utopian is, by definition, the impossible (the word, strictly translated, means ''no-place"). For both Marx and Hayek, utopians internalize an abstract, exaggerated sense of human possibility, aiming to create new social formations based upon a pretense of knowledge.
In their blueprints for the ideal society, utopians presuppose that people can master all the sophisticated complexities of social life. Even when their social and ethical ends are decidedly progressive, utopians often rely on reactionary means. They manifest an inherent bias toward the statist construction of alternative institutions in their attempts to practically implement their rationalist abstractions. Both the Marxian and Hayekian perspectives agree that utopianism:
1. fails to take into account the social and historical context of the society that exists;
2. fails to recognize the internal relationship between the theorist and his or her sociohistorical setting;
3. reifies human rationality as a capacity abstracted from social and historical specificity;
4. depends on constructivist rationalism to bridge the gap between conscious human purposes and unintended social consequences; and
5. fails to appreciate the complexity of social action that is constituted by both articulated and tacit elements.
And yet, despite their common anti-utopianism, Marx and Hayek differ with regard to some crucially important epistemic premises. For Hayek, Marx's vision of the ideal communist society rests on the mistaken assumption that in the future, people will be capable of mastering their own destiny. In Hayek's view, this grandiose Marxist illusion served as an ideological legitimation for modern attempts to achieve the millennium through the coercive power of the state.
Hayek explains that for important ontological and epistemological reasons, such a utopian goal must engender dystopian consequences. For Marxists, however, any such epistemic constraints are historically specific to capitalism. Such critics as Hilary Wainwright contend that Hayek embraces a "dogmatically individualist" view of knowledge that does not recognize the potential for efficacious collective action.
Despite their differences, both Marx and Hayek embrace a profoundly anti-utopian mode of inquiry. Marx identified this method as dialectics. His own use of dialectical conceptual tools represented the apotheosis of genuinely radical social theorizing. Indeed, Marx's insightful critique of his utopian contemporaries was a reflection of this dialectical approach.
Tuesday, May 16, 2017
Transhumanism's Roots In Eugenics
Article by Rebecca Taylor
Transhumanists say they want to take man's evolution into their own hands creating a race of "post-humans."
There are many flaws in Transhumanist utopian ideas, most notably their refusal to acknowledge that Transhumanism will result in a world where the enhanced super-humans will naturally rule over the stupid, weak and miserable unenhanced. Those that can afford or have access to enhancements will be the elite and those who do not or cannot be enhanced will be slaves.
In studying the roots of Transhumanism, one finds the beginnings of the movement are attributed to Julian Huxley. Huxley wrote the following in his 1957 piece, "Transhumanism:"
We are already justified in the conviction that human life as we know it in history is a wretched makeshift, rooted in ignorance; and that it could be transcended by a state of existence based on the illumination of knowledge and comprehension, just as our modern control of physical nature based on science transcends the tentative fumblings of our ancestors, that were rooted in superstition and professional secrecy.So who was Julian Huxley? Besides being the brother of the famous novelist Aldous Huxley who wrote Brave New World, he was an evolutionary biologist and also a famous eugenicist. Eugenics was a movement of the early 20th century that tried to create a better human race by preventing the birth of those deemed "unfit." Eugenics literally means "good birth" and it seeks to "improve" the human gene pool. Eugenicists like Huxley assumed that the individual is nothing more than what is encoded in their genes. Huxley wrote the following about his fellow man:
The human species can, if it wishes, transcend itself —not just sporadically, an individual here in one way, an individual there in another way, but in its entirety, as humanity. We need a name for this new belief. Perhaps Transhumanism will serve: man remaining man, but transcending himself, by realizing new possibilities of and for his human nature.
“I believe in Transhumanism”: once there are enough people who can truly say that, the human species will be on the threshold of a new kind of existence, as different from ours as ours is from that of Pekin man. It will at last be consciously fulfilling its real destiny.
"No-one doubts the wisdom of managing the germ-plasm of agricultural stocks, so why not apply the same concept to human stocks?"The American Eugenics movement resulted in the forced sterilization of over 60,000 Americans in 33 states. And eugenics did not stop there. Adolf Hitler was a huge fan of eugenics and brought it to its natural conclusion in World War II where millions of the "genetically unfit" were experimented on and/or snuffed out in an effort to create a master race. Those considered unfit were everything from political dissidents, free-thinkers, homosexuals, criminals, weak, feeble-minded, insane, and disabled. Anyone who came against them was in danger. Doesn't that sound like this?
"The lowest strata are reproducing too fast. Therefore... they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; long unemployment should be a ground for sterilisation."
"...unless [civilised societies] invent and enforce adequate measures for regulating human reproduction, for controlling the quantity of population, and at least preventing the deterioration of quality of racial stock, they are doomed to decay..."
Huxley wasn't just any eugenicist either. He was president of the British Eugenics Society from 1959-1962, more than a decade AFTER the horrors of the Second World War was revealed. He coined the term Transhumanism right before his tenure as president of the British Eugenics Society.
I don't believe modern Transhumanists have any idea where their ideology originated, but it is still instructive toward what will lie ahead if they get their way. We have tried Transhumanism already, only it was called eugenics then. Eugenics, in its attempt to control the direction of human evolution, did, in fact, create a world where the lesser humans were second-class citizens whose rights and lives were forfeit to the "greater good" determined by the elite.
I will quote the modern fiction writer, Dean Koontz, who truly understands Transhumanism and its ramifications:
"We live in hubristic age, when politicians imagine themselves to be messiahs and when many in the sciences frankly discuss their dreams of creating a “post-human” civilization of genetically engineered supermen, ignorant of the fact that like minds have often come before them and have left no legacy but death, destruction, and despair."
Monday, May 15, 2017
Transhumanism– the world's most dangerous idea
Judaism and Transhumanism Part 2
We Are the Borg: Resistance is Anti-Semitic
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
A Transhumanist Projected Milestone Chart That Admits Their Goal is Mind Control Right Now
If you are not familiar with Transhumanism, check out the Wikipedia write-up here, you can also watch these introductory documentaries. I have already posted articles on this topic. To find these articles, look under the Transhumanist category on my blog located here. This is relevant to what I am saying in the articles located here and here about ethical issues and mind control.
In fact, look at the official goal chart of the Transhumanist movement below. They literally admit that their goal right now is MIND CONTROL with a brain-computer interface! This is exactly what I have been talking about. The reality is, this has been possible for a while. See this post that features a lecture of a neuroscientist from the Royal Society, you'll also see an old video clip there with Jose Delgado controlling a charging bull that has an implant in its brain.
It must be pointed out that they can get this in the human body in a completely non-invasive methodology now. They are doing this to tons of people. They have chips and nanotechnology in the brains of many unknowing citizens right now. I am one of these people. (See here for more about nanotechnology and here for brain-computer interface with synthetic telepathy.) They have the ability to get this into people with a simple injection, (see this video starting around 4 minutes and 25 seconds,) but they don't even need that. They can do it with a virus or a bacteria. For instance, just as if you were catching a cold. (See here and here.) Once it is inside you, it spreads. Also, see here for how RFID chips fuse with human brain cells and how they can be controlled. See here for more about classified technology. See here and here for how this is being used by intelligence agencies and organized crime more. This is where Transhumanism, eugenics and political control connect.
Wednesday, February 8, 2017
Transhumanism Nightmares
at the Very Bottom!
Monday, December 19, 2016
Dawn of Human 2.0? Nanobot Implants Connect Our Brains to the Internet and Give Us 'God-Like' Super-Intelligence
Maybe he means that by 2030 all of humanity will be hooked up. As pointed out here, this is the direction the world is going. We will all be a part of a gigantic world brain with everyone under constant surveillance, every moment of our lives will be recorded. You will be under thought monitoring for potential thoughts that deviate from the mean. Unless you know how to get this technology out of your body and brain or block it. This is already happening because intelligence agencies and organized crime have this technology and are using it.
They fail to mention some of the negative aspects of this technology in the article below. Like for instance, mind control, neuroplasticity of the brain and behavior and personality changes. They can also create pain in your body, injure you or kill you. They can literally give you concussions, cancer, brain damage, heart attacks or a stroke. Obviously, the youth, the elderly and the unhealthy are at the greatest risk. If this isn't enough, they can also shoot you with classified space-based weapons. (See here and here.) They have access to your brain, your EEG readout and your eyes and ears. In other words, they can see out your eyes and hear out your ears. See this old clip of a scientist looking out of a cat's eyes. What they have now is even more advanced.
See here and here for more about the ethical considerations of brain-computer interfaces and nanotechnology. For other articles on this topic, please see here. See here for more about DARPA Smartdust. See here for more about the DARPA Artificial Intelligence Control Grid. Also see here, here and here for more about using this sort of technology as a form of biowarfare. You can also see here, here and here for more about Smartdust.
============================================================================
- A computer scientist says nanobots could connect our brains to the Cloud
- This allow people to back up their memories and communicate by thought
- It could also help to expand human creativity and emotions, he claims
abilities, expanding our capacity for emotions and creativity
change their shape in response to certain conditions in the body and a
molecular 'car' that uses balls of carbon as wheels (illustrated)
CREATING LIVING ROBOTS
The nanorobots, which can function like living computers, were created using DNA strands that fold and unfold like origami. Bioengineers hope DNA nanobots could carry out complex programs that could one day be used to diagnose or treat diseases.
Daniel Levner, a bioengineer at the Wyss Institute at Harvard University and his colleagues at Bar Ilan University in Ramat-Gan, Israel, made the nanobots by exploiting the binding properties of DNA. When DNA comes across a certain kind of protein, it unravels into two different strands, according to a report by Sarah Spickernell at New Scientist.
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
Tuesday, October 4, 2016
Google, Stanford University and the Intelligence Industry
2. The people on this site were involved in parroting and online stalking activity: www.partiallyexaminedlife.com it is full of academics from American universities. Many of these people know about Transhumanism and how intelligence agencies and the military are working closely with neuroscience and computer science departments in universities.
3. This philosophy blog: www.philosophybites.com which also runs this: http://www.neuroethics.ox.ac.uk/bio-ethics_bites and is connected to Oxford and the Royal Society.